Studies & Scientific experiments with laser

Studies & Scientific experiments with laser
There have been trials & studies of various doctors and scientists
around the world. None of the studies have shown no side effects
(Which is quite logical when samam wavelength creates life is used).
All the studies have been positive with various degrees (per cent) reported regrowth!

What is lacking in many people's eyes, however, is far-reaching studies. How long the treatment gives much power? Do you have to consider direct aid after the completion of the basic programs? Many questions like that you would like a reply! Now instead assume the existing clinics abroad which has been around longer than here in Sweden.

They have accumulated experiences of drugs, equipment (strength & nanometers) and support operations. None of these clinics to pay for long, large independent studies. There is one major reason for it. About LLLT (Low Level Laser Therapy) is approved as a medical form of treatment for hair loss, then no without proper training (doctors) perform treatments longer! Laser hair loss in sales of huge amounts of money around the world and has been great in many countries from 2001 onwards. Below insert a study t.om U.S.'s dermatologists felt so good that they chose to publish it in their own dictionary! This is huge given the fact that dermatologists generally have been laser for hair loss the worst enemy!

Photo Therapy of androgenetic alopecia with low-level narrow band 655-nm red light and 780-nm infrared light
Sang Seok Kim, MD, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Min Woo Park, MD, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Chong Ju Lee, MD, PhD, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Available online 20 January 2007th

Background: The therapeutic application of low energy laser Has Been Used for photobiostimulation and Low Level Laser Therapy Causes an Increase of micro-circulation of tissue and a reduction in inflammation. However, the effect of low-level laser therapy on the stimulation of hair growth hock Note Been investigated.

Object: To examine the effects of 655-nm red light and 780-nm infrared light on patient with androgenetic alopecia (AGA).

Method: Patient-treated Their village Scalp Them Selves, Using a portable light source (655 nm and 780 nm), and irradiation was Performed for 10 minutes once a day. Hairs in precisely Defined circle at the vertex (AGA region) and occipital sites Of The Scalp in 24 AGA male patient were Evaluated Using global photography and phototrichogram. Each circumscribed area of the Scalp, centered with a dot tattoo to ensure Reproducibility, was Photographed just after shaving and Two Days Later, The Same Area Again was Photographed. From the photo-images-the hair density and Anaga / telogen ratio (A / T ratio) were Determined by image analyzer software. Each patient was Evaluated at 0, 4, 9, and 14 weeks of photo therapy. After 14 weeks, the degree of satisfaction of patient and physicians were assessed.

Result: The results Can Be summerized AS FOLLOWS: (1) The mean hair counts of baseline were 137.3/cm2 On The vertices and 153.3/cm2 On The occiput, with the hair density of the occiput-being significantly Higher Than That Of The vertices. (2) The mean hair counts after 14 weeks, at the end of treatment, were 145.1/cm2 On The vertices and 163.3/cm2 On The occiput. Therapy with 655-nm red light and 780-nm infrared light significantly increased the density of Hairs on Both the vertex and occiput (P <.005). (3) The ratio of Anaga / telogen (A / T ratio) of baseline was 79.7 on the vertex, 89.6 on the occiput and A / T ratio at the end of treatment were 84.7 on the vertex and 91.9 on the occiput, respectively. (4) The Number Of Satisfied patient at the end of treatment was 20 (83.3%). No side effects were Reported.

Conclusion: The hair counts was Affected beneficially into the vertex and occipital region of the patient with androgenetic alopecia after 14 weeks of photo-therapy with 655-nm red light and 780-nm infrared light.


P1502Commercial Support: None Identified.
The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 56, Issue 2, Supplement 2, February 2007, Page AB112
Poster Abstracts, American Academy of Dermatology 65th Annual Meeting